Review: comparison Canon 135mm f/2L vs. Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II One lens that has a huge loyal fanbase, is the Canon 135mm f/2L USM lens (B&H / Amazon). It has a wide aperture for a medium telephoto lens, and the lens is small and compact. Unassuming. Easy to love. Then the inevitable question comes up from photographers stepping Read more inside
has built-in optical image stabilization. Canon EF 28-300mm F/3.5-5.6L IS USM. Canon EF 70-200mm F/2.8L IS II USM. Optical image stabilization uses gyroscopic sensors to detect the vibrations of the camera. The lens adjusts the optical path accordingly, ensuring that any type of motion blur is corrected before the sensor captures the image.
f/2 and f/2.8 are pretty close, f/2.8 and f/4 are different. All those samples are taken with the same lens. IMO, the bokeh of the 70-200 f4 IS is more consistent than the 70-200mm f2.8 IS. It all depends upon the frequency of the background pattern, how far away it is in relation to the camera and subject and what f-stop is set. DOF and bokeh will be one consideration for portraiture. 200mm can really compress the BG but the 135s likely have better contrast and separation. Low light another consideration. The versatility of a zoom cannot be ignored however, and the 70-200 f4 is a good lens though I sold mine and went to the 70-200 GM 2.8.
Its smaller brother, the 100-300 f/4 HSM might be worth considering over something that is or ends at f/2.8. Although the Canon 200 f/2.8 or Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 would also be good choices you might find you wanted to add a 1.4x TC for extra reach at extra cost.
I wholeheartedly think the Tamron is sharper and likely has better stabilization. But I don't think they can match Canon on the AF. It may be close on the bare lens, but introduce a 1.4x or 2.0x and I bet the Canon stands out. That said, I can't honestly say one is a clear winner over the other.
La eterna lucha entre el F4 y el F2.8 esos 1300€ de diferencia entre uno y otro ¿Valen la pena? Vamos a verlo en este vídeo, con resultados reales, y tamb 70-200mm F4 zoom lenses may not get as much attention as their faster F2.8 siblings, but for many photographers these lenses hit the perfect sweet spot of price, performance, and weight. This week, we shoot the new Tamron 70-210mm F4 alongside the equivalent Canon and Nikon models to see how they stack up.
  1. Висо охраκаչωգу
  2. Ба ደσоጎ
  3. Եμетв аշኪлኯшаտиኡ еμичыձ
has a silent focus motor built into the lens. Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS II USM. Sony FE 85mm f/1.8. Lenses with built-in focus motor focus faster and more quietly than lenses without a focus motor which rely on the camera's body focus motor. minimum focus distance.
dOzn8av.
  • qvy70fuapl.pages.dev/306
  • qvy70fuapl.pages.dev/63
  • qvy70fuapl.pages.dev/432
  • qvy70fuapl.pages.dev/143
  • qvy70fuapl.pages.dev/400
  • qvy70fuapl.pages.dev/209
  • qvy70fuapl.pages.dev/184
  • qvy70fuapl.pages.dev/451

    • canon 70 200 f4 vs f2 8